ISSN: 2536-7099
Model: Open Access/Peer Reviewed
DOI: 10.31248/JASVM
Start Year: 2016
Email: jasvm@integrityresjournals.org
https://doi.org/10.31248/JASVM2025.648 | Article Number: A69DF01710 | Vol.11 (2) - April 2026
Received Date: 15 March 2026 | Accepted Date: 24 April 2026 | Published Date: 30 April 2026
Authors: Amana, O. C.* and Igbatigbi, L. O.
Keywords: performance., rabbits, reproductive, Crossbreed, Dutch and New Zealand White
The study evaluated the reproductive performance of Dutch and New Zealand White rabbits and their crosses under tropical management conditions. Sixty kits representing four genetic groups were produced from a foundation stock of 10 does and 8 bucks. The genetic groups included purebred New Zealand White (NZW×NZW), purebred Dutch (DU×DU), and two crossbreds (NZW×DU and DU×NZW). Results showed that the genetic group significantly (p≤0.05) influenced all the reproductive traits measured. Correlation analysis showed strong and significant positive and negative relationships among the measured reproductive traits. The study concluded that the genetic group significantly affected reproductive and growth traits in rabbits. The NZW showed shorter gestation length and good litter performance, confirming its value as a maternal line. The DU×NZW cross had a lower litter size but superior weaning weight, indicating improved growth. Strong positive correlations between litter size at birth and weaning, and between birth and weaning weights, suggest early traits predict later performance, although negative associations with litter size indicate a trade-off with growth. These results highlight the need to balance prolificacy and growth, and to carefully consider crossbreeding strategies for optimal productivity in rabbit production.
| Abdel-Hamid, T. M. (2015). Crossbreeding parameters for growth traits in a complete three breeds diallel cross design of rabbits in Egypt. Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research, 2(2), 120-127. https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2015.b60 |
||||
| Abou Khadiga, G., Youssef, Y. M. K., Saleh, K., Nofal, R. Y., & Baselga, M. (2010). Genetic trend in selection for litter weight in two maternal lines of rabbits in Egypt. World Rabbit Science, 18(1), 27-32. https://doi.org/10.4995/WRS.2010.18.04 |
||||
| Apori, S. O., Hagan, J. K., & Osei, D. (2015). The growth and reproductive performance of different breeds of rabbits kept under warm and humid environments in Ghana. Online Journal of Animal Feed Research, 4(3), 51-58. | ||||
| Ayoola, M. A., Fayeye, T. R., & Ayorinde, K. L. (2016). Gestation length, litter size at birth and their effects on some reproductive traits of domestic rabbits in Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Agriculture, Food and Environment, 12(2), 81-84. | ||||
| Erdaw, M. M., & Beyene, W. T. (2022). Trends, prospects and the socio-economic contribution of poultry production in sub-Saharan Africa: a review. World's Poultry Science Journal, 78(3), 835-852. https://doi.org/10.1080/00439339.2022.2092437 |
||||
| Ewegbemi, O. T., Olowu, O. P. A., Teniola, O. R., & Olaleye, O. J. (2018). Evaluation of the reproductive performance of three selected rabbit breeds (chinchilla, dutch and New Zealand white does mated with Dutch buck. JABU International Journal of Agriculture and Food Science, 8, 1220-1225. | ||||
| Fadare, A. O., & Fatoba, T. J. (2018). Reproductive performance of four breeds of rabbit in the humid tropics. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 30(7), 114. | ||||
| Hameed, M., Joshua, T., Alexander, O., & Rabiu, I. (2020). Assessment of committed effective dose from drinking water available to Anyigba dwellers, North Central Nigeria. International Journal of Physics, 2(1), 29-33. https://doi.org/10.33545/26647575.2020.v2.i1a.29 |
||||
| Hutu, I., & Onan, G. W. (2019). Crossbreeding, heterosis and complementation. In: Hutu, I., & Onan, G. W. (eds.). Animal production: Practical exercises (2nd edition). Pp. 115-124 Agroprint - Timişoara, RO. | ||||
| Irekhore, O. T. (2017). Reproductive performance of four breeds of rabbit in the tropics. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Nigerian Society for Animal Production (NSAP) (pp. 120-122). Calabar, Nigeria. | ||||
| Kebede, T., Adugna, S., & Keffale, M. (2018). Review on the role of crossbreeding in improvement of dairy production in Ethiopia. Global Veterinarian, 20(2), 81-90. | ||||
| Kumaresan, A., Pathak, K. A., Chetri, B., & Ahmed, S. K. (2011). Performance of New Zealand White and Soviet Chinchilla rabbits under agro-climatic conditions of Mizoram. Indian Journal of Hill Farming, 24(1), 21-23. | ||||
| Lebas, F. (1997). Reflection on rabbit nutrition with a special emphasis on feed ingredients utilisation. Cuniculture, France. | ||||
| Lukefahr, S. D., McNitt, J. I., Cheeke, P. R., & Patton, N. M. (2022). Rabbit production (10th edition). CABI. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781789249811.0000 |
||||
| Nofal, R., Saleh, K., Younis, H., & Abou Khadiga, G. (2005). Evaluation of Spanish synthetic line V and Baladi Black rabbits and their crosses under Egyptian conditions: Litter size. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Rabbit Production in Hot Climates (pp. 24-27). | ||||
| Nwakpu, P. E. (2013). Preweaning litter growth and weaning characteristics among inbred and crossbred native by exotic piglet genotypes. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America, 4(4), 393-397. https://doi.org/10.5251/abjna.2013.4.4.393.397 |
||||
| Nwakpu, P. E., & Omeje, S. I. (2004). Heterosis for body weight in native by exotic inbred pig crosses. Journal of Science, Agriculture Food Technology and Environment, 4, 50-60. | ||||
| Nwakpu, P. E., & Ucheji, C. C. (2018). Reproductive performance and survivability of kittens of three popular breeds of rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) in Abakaliki, Nigeria. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Bioresearch, 3(4), 74-83. | ||||
| Odeyinka, S. M., Oyedele, O. J., Adeleke, T. O., & Odedire, J. A. (2008). Reproductive performance of rabbits fed Moringa oleifera as a replacement for Centrosema pubescens. In Proceedings of the 9th World Rabbit Congress (pp. 411-416). Verona, Italy. | ||||
| Ogundimu, U. E. (2001). Repeatability estimates and prediction of milk suckled per kit from performance traits in Dutch rabbits. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and the Environment, 3(1), 149-154. | ||||
| Pinto-Pinho, P., Pinto, M. D. L., Monteiro, J., Fardilha, M., Pinto-Leite, R., & Colaço, B. (2023). Pregnancy complications and feto-maternal monitoring in rabbits. Veterinary Sciences, 10(10), 622. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10100622 |
||||
| Popli, P., Shukla, V., Kaushal, J. B., Kumar, R., Gupta, K., & Dwivedi, A. (2022). Peroxiredoxin 6 Plays essential role in mediating fertilization and early embryonic development in rabbit oviduct. Reproductive Sciences, 29(5), 1560-1576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00689-x |
||||
| Qodirova, S., & Ruzikulova, Z. (2023). Problems and solutions of rabbit breeding and breeding technology. Science and Innovation, 2(D8), 47-50. | ||||
| Rashwan, A. A., & Marai, I. F. M. (2000). Mortality in young rabbits: A review. World Rabbit Science, 8(3), 111-124. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2000.427 |
||||
| Roberts, J. D., & Lukefahr, S. D. (1992). Evaluation of Californian, Champagne d'Argent, New Zealand White and Palomino as potential sire breeds: I. Postweaning litter traits. Journal of Applied Rabbit Research, 15, 274-286. | ||||
| Setiaji, A., Lestari, D. A., Pandupuspitasari, N. S., Agusetyaningsih, I., Sutopo, S., & Kurnianto, E. (2024). Crossbreeding experiment on Indonesian local rabbits: the heterosis effect on growth performance. Archives Animal Breeding, 67(2), 231-236. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-67-231-2024 |
||||
| Sibanda, B., Moyo, M. T., & Mugoti, A. (2024). Effects of feeding sun-dried bovine rumen contents on growth and carcass quality of New Zealand White rabbits. Bulgarian Journal of Animal Husbandry, 61(3), 39-47. https://doi.org/10.61308/IKGJ7115 |
||||
| Tomkowiak, A., Bocianowski, J., Kwiatek, M., & Kowalczewski, P. Ł. (2020). Dependence of the heterosis effect on genetic distance, determined using various molecular markers. Open Life Sciences, 15(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1515/biol-2020-0001 |
||||